Holistic pedagogy for nurturing faithful, resilient and empathetic students - in UNTAG Semarang architectural education

Eko Nursanty, Loekman Muhamadi, Anwar Anwar

Sari


Nowadays education is often seen as a way to improve the "quality" of human life. Education is often considered as a benchmark for future material success and strength. Some study programs are perceived as the enabler of that hopes and become the dreams of many people. On the other hand, some study programs are considered "boring" and less desirable. This study aims to provide a different perspective that the educational process is fundamentally a continuous process and not a linear progression towards a utopian goal that many people expect. Human being possesses various physical, mental and intellectual potentials that can be nurtured through various innovative pedagogical methods. The research was conducted on some architecture students of UNTAG Semarang using qualitative methods of deductive case studies with comprehensive interview techniques. The analysis was carried out using the "Butterfly" method that scrutinized two seemingly opposing sides and found a balance between the opposites. The study results are the identification and formulations of several dominant elements that equally playing important roles in the architectural educational process, specifically focusing on the human’s spiritual, intellectual, and physical sides.  Those elements, supported by the environmental context, can produce various combinations of new values, knowledge, and skills, that are deeply rooted in the field of knowledge and in their daily lives.


Kata Kunci


holistic pedagogy; human centered education; faithful student, resilient student; empathetic student; architectural education

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi


Li G. Culturally contested pedagogy: Battles of literacy and schooling between mainstream teachers and Asian immigrant parents: Suny Press; 2012.

Petrie. Pedagogy of the oppressed USA: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2018.

Shulman L. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review. 2017; 15(2): p. 4-14.

Petrie. Pedagogy – a holistic, personal approach to work with children and young people. Briefing paper. 2009; 4.

Salama AM. Transformative Pedagogy In Architecture And Urbansim: UMBAU-VERLAG & Ashraf M. Salama; 2009.

Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed New York: Continuum; 2006.

Giroux H. Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling New York: Westview/Harper Collins; 1997.

Jojola T. Indigenous planning: An emerging context. Canadian Journal of Urban Research. 2008; 17: p. 37–47.

Walker R,JT,&ND. Reclaiming indigenous planning Montreal: McGill-Queen University Press; 2013.

Horowitz MJ. Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.

Horowitz MJ. Self-Identity Theory and Research Methods. Journal of Research Practice. 2012; 8(2).


Article Metrics

Sari view : 376 times
PDF (English) - 0 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.