STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING IN LEARNING AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT USING DEBATE

Fitriana Dewi, Arso Setyaji, Ririn Ambarini

Sari


Critical thinking is important in learning English to understand and comprehend information. This study aims, first, to describe students’ critical thinking in learning agreement and disagreement using debate. Second, to describe the most component of critical thinking used by students in learning agreement and disagreement using debate. Last, to describe students’ perceptions of their critical thinking in learning agreement and disagreement using debate. The subject of this study is X PPLG 1 of SMK N 7 Semarang. This study uses a case study descriptive qualitative research method. The Researchers do observation, use video recording, and students’ work in collecting data. Also, we include students-interview to give validation in this study. In analyzing the data, we use five indicators of critical thinking, a theory from Ennis which are: Giving a simple explanation, Building fundamental skills, Concluding, Providing further explanation, set strategy, and technique. The findings of this study indicates that students can think critically and use five indicators of critical thinking in learning agreement and disagreement using debate. With mostly use of indicators; give a simple explanation and set strategies and techniques. The students combine small discussions and use translation apps in debate as critical thinking indicators of strategies and techniques. It is hoped that this research is useful in terms of implementing critical thinking in students. Critical thinking helps students learn deeper about information, especially English.


Referensi


Anugraheni, I. (2020). Analisis kesulitan mahasiswa dalam menumbuhkan berpikir kritis melalui pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i1.197

Azka, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions on the use of debate in speaking class: a case of undergraduate students at universitas muhammadiyah surakarta in 2016/2017 academic year. 21(2), 1689–1699. https://www.oecd.org/dac/accountable-effectiveinstitutions/Governance Notebook 2.6 Smoke.pdf

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research method in applied linguistic. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo (2019). Critical thinking, creative thinking, and learning achievement: how they are relate. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012070

Fuad, A. J., Ardhana, I. W., Sulton & Kuswandi, D. (2018).Observing debate in learning on students’ critical thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(3), 123–133

Gandhimathi, A., & Zarehi, N. (2018). The impact of critical thinking on learning English language. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 1(2). Retrieved March 5, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344487381

Hayati, W, I., Utaya, S., & Astina, I. K.(2016). Efektivitas student worksheet berbasis project based learning dalam menumbuhkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran geografi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 468-474

Hennink, M., Hutter, I & Bailey, A. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hidayati, N. R. (2016). The use of charade game to teach vocabulary (an experimental study of the seventh graders of mts. Miftahul Khoirot Branjang in the Academic Year of 2014/2015). ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1)

Hidayoza, P., Amri, Z., & Wahyuni, D. (2019). level of public speaking anxiety and coping strategy used by english debaters at unit kegiatan bahasa asing in dealing with english debate. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1)

Ikhsan, M. K (2019). Word expressions of agreement and disagreement used by the students in speaking class. English Education Journal (EEJ), 10(1), 112-127

https://guru.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum/perkenalan/profil-pelajar-pancasila/pengertian/ [Accessed March 5, 2023]

Lestari S, A. I., Ahmad, B. Y., & Sumarta. (2021). EFL students’ perception of speaking course through debating process during the pandemic. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 8(2)

Ningsih, F., Ikhsanudin, & Arifin, Z. (2018). Using English video conversation “asking and giving opinion” to improve students’ speaking ability. English Education Study Program of Language and Arts Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Tanjungpura University.

Nurfaizah, Putro, K. Z., & Tejaningrum, D. (2022). Students’ critical thinking skills in the learning strategy course. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(1), 46-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v15i1.41689

Rabiah, S. (2018). Language as a tool for communication and cultural reality discloser. Rahmah, A & Adnan, A. (2017). Activating students’ speaking ability in asking and giving opinion by using quality questioning strategy for senior high school students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1)

Rimiene, V. (2002). Assessing and developing students’ critical thinking. Psycology Learning and Teachingg, 2(1)

Sánchez, S. G. (2020). Debates in English language education: a multimodal, collaborative ecosystem. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 10(4)

Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta. ------------. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tien, H. N. (2020). Developing critical thinking in English teaching and learning. Retrieved March 5, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338955980




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/lime.v5i01.3867

Article Metrics

Sari view : 0 times
PDF (English) - 0 times PDF (English) - 0 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.