STRENGTHENING DIVERSION REGULATIONS AGAINST CHILDREN DRUG ABUSE
Abstract
Children are the nation's next-generation who must be protected from all forms of violence, discrimination and deprivation of liberty. The purpose of writing this article is to find out and analyze legal regulations in Indonesia, which seek to provide legal protection for children who abuse narcotics and how the sanctions can be imposed. The writing of this article uses the empirical normative juridical research method, which is a study that seeks to analyze a qualitative descriptive of events that are happening in the community, especially regarding the protection of children in conflict with the law. The results showed that children who dealt with narcotics abuse did not get diversion, such as the case in Court Decision Number 19/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN.Smg, in which a fifteen-year-old child who uses Narcotics Category I is carrying one bag of a small plastic clip in the form of Methamphetamine and the urine turns out to be positive containing Methamphetamine is threatened with Article 114 paragraph (1) Juncto Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics with the threat of 5 (five) years imprisonment, this is contrary to the purpose of diversion as in Article 6 letter b of Law Number 11 of 2016 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children which states, diversion aims to prevent children from being deprived of freedom. Children have the right to get their rights without asking for it. Based on Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, the child is sentenced to two years and work training for three months. Children should not be penalized and get Diversion.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aleta Nieva Nishimori. (2019). Daftar Usia Peratanggungjawaban di Beberapa Negara Asia. Abscbn. https://https//news.abscbn.com/focus/01/23/19/list_age_of_criminal_liability_in_some_asian_co untries
Angger Sigit Pramukti dan Fuady Primaharsya. (2015). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Pustaka Yutisia.
Deny. (2018). Hanya Sepuluh Persen Kasus Pidana Anak Diselesaikan Secara Pantas. Tribun Jateng. https://jateng.tribunews.com/2018/05/01
DK, S. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Juvenile Justice Act and System in India. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000296
Franz Magnis Suseno. (1992). Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis. P.T. Kanisius.
Hambali, A. R. (2019). Penerapan Diversi terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.v13.15-30
Hartono. (2015). Penerapan Diversi Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Anak di Polres Semarang. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(3), 361–378.
Institue Criminal Justice Reform. (2017). Problem Implimentasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Masih Ditemukan. https://icjr.or.id
Jonaedi Efendi dan Ismu Gunadi Widodo. (2018). Kamus istilah Hukum Populer, Cetakan Kedua. Prenada Media Group.
Lawrence Meir Friedman. (2009). Sistem Hukum dalam Persepktif Ilmu Sosial. Nusa Media.
Leden Marpaung. (2009). Asas Teori Praktek Hukum Pidana. P.T. Sinar Grafika.
Muhammad Abdulkadir. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Kesatu. P.T. Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Muhammad Fakri Ramadhani, Christoper Desmawangga, dan R. T. (2016). Sering Bergaul dengan Tahanan Dewasa, Narapidana Anak Bisa Jadi Lebih Jahat. Tribun.News. https://kaltim.tribunews.com/2016/08/13
Muhammad Muslih. (2006). Filsafat Ilmu. P.T. Belukar.
Phillipus M. Hadjon. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. P.T.Bina Ilmu.
Pratama, A. W., Rozah, U., & Sri, A. M. E. (2016). dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 1–18.
Prianter Jaya Hairi. (2018). Konsep dan Pembaruan Residivisme dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. DPR. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id
Puput Purwanti. (2018). Sepuluh Penyebab Tindak Kriminal di Indonesia Semakin Meningkat. Hukamnas. https://hukamnas.com
Roeslan Saleh. (1986). Pembinaan Cita Hukum dan Asas-Asas Hukum Nasional. Karya Dunia Pikir.
Rusli Muhammad. (2019). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Penerbit Universitas Islam Indonesia Press.
Samidjo. (1985). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. P.T. Armico, Bandung.
Suharso dan Ana Retnoningsih. (2017). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indoneisa, Edisi Lux, Cetakan Kesebelas. C.V. Widya Karya.
Surbakti, F. M., & Zuliandi, R. (2019). Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS). https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v2i1.58
The age of criminal responsibility. (2020). In Law for Social Workers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843143895-62
Timasheff, N. S. (1946). General Theory of Law and State. Thought. https://doi.org/10.5840/thought194621154
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jpl.v1i1.1802
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1036 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Philosophy of Law is published by the Law Study Program, Doctoral Program, Faculty of Law, University of 17 August 1945, Semarang. Editor's Address: Jl. Pemuda No. 70, Pandansari Village, Central Semarang District, Semarang City, Central Java 50132 Tel. (024) 86400797