THE AUTHORITY OF POLICE INVESTIGATORS IN ERADICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

Cahyo Dati Widodo, Syafiuddin A rahim, Abdi Negara

Abstract


Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Law on Corruption Eradication Commission which is a renewal of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption, instead of Law number 3 of 1971. The enactment of this law is expected to accelerate the growth of people’s welfare, responding to the evil nature contained in corruption. The problem in this study is how is the authority of police investigators in eradicating criminal acts of corruption after the issuance of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning Law on Corruption Eradication Commission and what obstacles faced by investigators related to the authority of police investigators in eradicating criminal acts of corruption after the issuance of Law on Corruption Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning Law on Corruption Eradication Commission. The method in this study uses descriptive qualitative research methods with a normative juridical approach. The results of this study are : (1) The authority of police investigators is to carry out investigations. Investigation activities are a follow-up to investigations that have found the construction of corruption crimes that have occurred to some extent. The law gives special rights or privileges to investigators to carry out investigative functions such as summoning, examining, arresting, detaining, confiscating, and determining suspects. (2) The obstacles faced concerning the authority of police investigators are a) The number of members of criminal investigators is limited. b) Information received regarding criminal acts of corruption is still unclear and in detail. c) Operating costs that have not been met. d) Lack of public legal awareness. The solution to the obstacles faced is by a) Gradually increasing the number of criminal investigators. b) Speed up all access to information related to criminal acts of corruption. c) The government needs to increase the operational cost budget item. d) It is necessary to hold outreach to the community either directly or through electronic media or social media.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Sabah AZ, A. F. (2017). KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan. Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Ad.V6i1.4875

Arief, M. Dan B. N. (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Alumni.

Barda Nawawi Arief. (2000). Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara. Badan Penerbit Undip.

Evi Hartanti. (2005). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika.

Jaya, N. S. P. (N.D.). Beberapa Pemikiran Ke Arah Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mukti Fajar ND Dan Yulianto Achmad. (2013). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empihs. Pustaka Pelajar.

Nadir & Win Yuli Wardani. (2018). POLITIK HUKUM DALAM PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA: ARAH DAN SUBSTANSINYA. Jurnal Yustisia.

Nuriyanto, N. (2014). Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia, Sudahkah Berlandaskan Konsep “Welfare State”? Jurnal Konstitusi.

Robert Klitgaard. (1998). Membasmi Korupsi. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Romli Atmasasmita. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi,Aspek Nasional Dan Aspek Internasional. Mandar Maju.

Rusdi, R., Mulyadi, M., & Afan, I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Penghentian Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditreskrimsus Polda Sumatera Utara. Journal Of Education, Humaniora And Social Sciences (JEHSS). Https://Doi.Org/10.34007/Jehss.V2i3.78

Satria, A. P. (2020). Sibernetika Talcott Parsons: Suatu Analisis Terhadap Omnibus Law Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan Kerja Di Indonesia. Indonesian State Law Review.

Setyawan, B. P., Wahyudi, S., & Yuris, D. P. (2020). Peran Satuan Petugas Anti Mafia Bola Terhadap Pengungkapan Tindak Pidana Pengaturan Skor (Match Fixing). Soedirman Law Review.

Siallagan, H. (2016). PENERAPAN PRINSIP NEGARA HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Sosiohumaniora. Https://Doi.Org/10.24198/Sosiohumaniora.V18i2.9947

Soemarsono, M. (2017). NEGARA HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI SUDUT TEORI TUJUAN NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. Https://Doi.Org/10.21143/Jhp.Vol37.No2.1480

Sukananda, S., & Destiana, C. D. (2019). Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. In Evaluasi Peran Penegakan Hukum Oleh ….

Supriyanta, S. M. H. (2009). KUHAP Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Wacana Hukum.

Thomas Barker & David L. Carter. (1999). Police Deviance (Penyimpangan Polisi). Cipta Manunggal.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35973/jpl.v1i2.2516

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 46 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




DISKRIPSI JURNAL

Journal of Philosophy of Law  is published by the Law Study Program, Doctoral Program, Faculty of Law, University of 17 August 1945, Semarang. Editor's Address: Jl. Pemuda No. 70, Pandansari Village, Central Semarang District, Semarang City, Central Java 50132 Tel. (024) 86400797

Copyright (c) 2021