![Open Access](http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
IDEOLOGICAL AND LEGAL POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON THE EXISTENCE OF ROHINGYA REFUGEES IN INDONESIA
Abstract
The occurrence of the Rohingya and Rakhine ethnic conflict is a religious conflict in Myanmar between Islam and Buddhism that makes attention to the world, because the conflict resulted in ethnic Rohinya fleeing to neighboring countries, one of which is Indonesia. Indonesia is a legal state that upholds the sovereignty of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, but in addition to sovereignty there is a state ideology in the form of Pancasila which contains many humanitarian values. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal policies contained in Indonesia and how the Pancasila values are viewed towards foreigners who are refugees. The type of research used is normative or commonly called library research, the research approach is carried out with descriptive analysis with data collection techniques in the form of literature review, books, mass media, articles, journals, internet. The results of this study are that actually internationally normative, Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 convention and 1956 protocol, but Indonesia itself has specific guidelines for handling refugees contained in Presidential Regulation Number 125 of 2016 and Law Number 37 of 1999. There are several things that make Indonesia unable to ratify the Convention, namely if Indonesia ratifies it must comply with the convention, for example Article 17 of the 1951 Convention, namely the state must be responsible for providing jobs for refugees, even though Indonesia as a developing country still has a high unemployment rate, then Article 21 there is a provision that refugees must be given a house, even though the poverty rate of Indonesian citizens is still high and other articles that the Indonesian people have not been able to fulfill what is required in the convention. Then if seen from the point of view of Pancasila, Pancasila contains humanitarian values which means that upholding the human rights of anyone, including Rohingya refugees.
Keywords
References
Afriandi, F., & Nizmi, Y. E. (2014). Kepentingan Indonesia Belum Meratifikasi Konvensi 1951 dan Protokol 1967 Mengenai Pengungsi Internasional dan Pencari Suaka. Transnasional, 5(2), 1093–1107.
Anggian Cassilas dan Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. (2021). Kekuatan Nilai “PANCASILA“ Sebagai Ideologi Negara Untuk Keberlangsungan Hidup Bangsa. Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 2267–2285.
Auli, R. C., & Pratama, G. G. (2020). The Failure of United Nations System under International Law: Its Contribution to Calamity and Ruin of the Rohingya Case. PADJADJARAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 4(2), 265–279.
Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo. (2012). PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PENGUNGSI INTERNASIONAL Ayub. Yustisia, 1(2), 169–179.
Christyanti, B. L. (2022). Hak Suaka versus Kedaulatan: Studi Kasus Pencari Suaka Etnis Rohingya. Jurnal HAM, 13(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.333-346
Fattah, V. (2017). Hak Asasi Manusia Sebagai Jus Cogens Dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Atas Pendidikan. Yuridika, 32(2), 352. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i2.4775
Jovano, S. T., & Gea, C. A. (2021). Penanganan Pengungsi yang Bunuh Diri di Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(3), 361–372.
Maulana, A. (2023). Prinsip Pancasila Perlu Dijaga dalam Seluruh Aktivitas Negara. Universitas Padjadjaran.
Primadasa, C. P., Mahendra Putra Kurnia, & Rika Erawaty. (2021). Problematika Penanganan Pengungsi di Indonesia Dari Perspektif Hukum Pengungsi Internasional. Risalah Hukum, 17(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i1.380
Putu, N., Yuliartini, R., Gede, D., & Mangku, S. (2019). Tindakan Genosida terhadap Etnis Rohingya dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Cakrawala Hukum, 21(1), 38–46.
Riyanto, S. (2012). Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Kontemporer. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 1(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10074
Sefriani. (2011). Ketaatan Masyarakat Internasional Terhadap Hukum Internasional Dalam Perspekti Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss3.art6
Siba, M. A. M., & Qomari’ah, A. N. (2018). Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konflik Rohingya. Jurnal Islamic Word and Politics, 2(2), 368–385.
Sultoni, Y., Widagdo, S., Hum, M., & Suryokumoro, H. (2014). Alasan Indonesia Belum Meratifikasi Konvensi 1951 Tentang Pengungsi Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengungsi Di Indonesia. Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 6, 1–14.
Suryono, M. S. (2023). 14 Fakta Mengenai Pengungsi Rohingya. UNHCR Indonesia.
Tegal. (2017). Nilai Pancasila adalah Kekuatan Moral Putusan Hakim. JUDICIAL COMMISSION.
United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). (2001). Refugee Protection: A Guide to International Refugee Law (Handbook for Parliamentarians). 14(1).
Widisuseno, I. (2014). Azas Filosofis Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Dan Dasar Negara. Humanika, 20(2), 62–66.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jpl.v5i2.5219
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 16 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Philosophy of Law is published by the Law Study Program, Doctoral Program, Faculty of Law, University of 17 August 1945, Semarang. Editor's Address: Jl. Pemuda No. 70, Pandansari Village, Central Semarang District, Semarang City, Central Java 50132 Tel. (024) 86400797