PROPORTIONALITIES OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS ON THE POSITION OF CONCURRENT CREDITORS AS AN EFFORT TO ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF THE PARTIES IN BANKRUPTCY DISPUTES

Satino Satino, Muhammad Fauzan

Abstract


Bankruptcy which is a condition in which the debtor is unable to make payments on his debts to creditors. In the dispute process, there is a sequence of creditor levels which will affect the settlement of creditor receivables, namely preferential, separatist and concurrent creditors. Concurrent creditors who are at the last level make their position very vulnerable to not getting their receivables repaid. This requires further research in this regard. This study uses a normative legal method which will analyze legal sources and legal literature related to the topics discussed. This research will discuss 1) what is the position of concurrent creditors in bankruptcy disputes and 2) how is the proportionality of the judge's decision on the position of concurrent creditors in bankruptcy disputes as an effort to enforce the legal certainty of the parties? The results of this study indicate that the position of concurrent creditors in bankruptcy disputes is that creditors are the most recent in paying off their receivables. Then the proportionality of the judge's decision on concurrent creditors is given to the supervisory judge as the party who has the authority to distribute the proceeds from the sale of the bankrupt debtor's assets. Concurrent creditors will receive results based on Article 189 Paragraph (3) Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Suspension Obligations.

Keywords


Bankruptcy, Concurrent Creditors, Judge's Decision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackbar, Muhammad. “Pertanggungjawaban Debitor pailit Terhadap Utang yang Belum Terlunasi Dalam perkara Kepailitan”, Kertha Semaya 3, no. 1 (2015). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/37818.

Agustina, Sita. “Analisis Tentang Pengaturan Oleh Pemerintah Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Negara Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 5, no. 2 (2014).

Asnawi MN. (2014). Hermeunika Putusan Hakim, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2014).

Endrawati, Nettu. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Anak di Sektor Informal (Studi Kasus Di Kota Kediri)”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 2 (2012).

Finallisa, Widhi Handoko and Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Yang Bersifat Condemnatoir dalam Perkara Pembagian Harta Bersama (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Kudus)”, Notarius Vol. 13 No. 1, (2020), hlm. 360. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.30468.

Fuady, Munir. Hukum Jaminan Utang, (Jakarta: Erlangga, 2013).

Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Bidang Eksekusi Perdata, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009).

Harahap, Zairin. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014).

Harjono. (2008). Konstitusi sebagai Rumah Pemikiran Hukum Dr. Harjono, S.H., M.C.L Wakil Ketua MK. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, p. 176.

Husni, R.M. Taufik. “Kedudukan Kreditur Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kepailitan,” Supremasi Hukum 16, no. 2 (2020).

Kenting, Yohanes Alexander and Hizkia Dapot Parulian. “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Rencana Perdamaian Dalam Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang,” ALETHEA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2022).

Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations for Payment of Debt.

Lee, E.T., & Ellis, J.M. (2012). The Standing Doctrine’s Dirty Little Secret. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(1): 185.

Mantili, Rai and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi, “Perlindungan Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Hukum Kepailitan,” Akses Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 12, no. 2 (2020): 98.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2010).

Mertokusumo, S. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia cet. ke-3. (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1981).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2021).

Muabezi, Zaherman Armandz. “Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtsstaat) Rule of Law And Not Power State,” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017).

Muslih, M. “Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum)”. Legalitas 4, no. 1 (2017).

Nasution, Balder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008).

Natalia, Titie Syahnaz. “Akibat Hukum Kepailitan terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Eksekusi hak Tanggungan”, Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya 16, no. 3 (2018).

Puspitasari, Metalia “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Debitor Yang Dinyatakan Pailit”, Skripsi Thesis Universitas Airlangga (2014): 32.

Putra, Sulistiyono Catur Kurnia dan Iwan Erar Joesoef, “Hak Mendahului Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak dalam Memperoleh Pelunasan Utang dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang PT Internux”, National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS) 2, no. 1 (2020).

Rachmat Runarianu and Suherman. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Harta Debitor Yang Dinyatakan Pailit”. Jurnal Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1.

Rahmah, I.F., Triningsih, A., Harumdani, A., & Kurniawan, N. (2011). Dasar Pertimbangan Yuridis Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Proses Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(5): 5 – 6.

Rakasatutya, Falahdika, Yulim and Hengki Andora. “Kedudukan Denda Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Dalam Kepailitian.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 1 (2023).

Rosenkranz, N.Q. (2010). The Subjects of The Constitution. Stanford Law Review, 62(5): 1240.

Sari, Arumi Riezky dan Iwan Erar Joesoef. “Peran Kurator Dalam Penanganan Kepailitian: Studi Lambatnya Pelaksanaan Putusan Kepailitan”, National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS) Vol. 2, No. 1 (2020): 234.

Sastrawidjaja, Man S. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. (Bandung: Alumni, 2014).

Setiadi, Haris. “Adakah Aturan Besaran Harta Pailit bagi Kreditur Konkuren,” Hukum Online, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/adakah-aturan-besaran-harta-pailit-bagi-kreditur-konkuren-lt62 83499e15a62, Diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2022 Pukul 17.38.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan. (Jakarta: Grafiti, 2010).

Soekanto Soerjono and Sri Mahmudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tujuan Singkat (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo, 2003).

Subagyo, Heri and I Made Kanthika. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Jaminan Kebendaan Pihak Ketiga dalam Perkara Kepailitan (Studi Kasus Perkara Kepailitan Nomor: 21/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-lain/2019 PN.Niaga.Sby., jo. Perkara Nomor 18/Pdt.Sus/PKPU/2018/PN.Sby).” Journal Equitable 8, no. 2 (2023).

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan (Jakarta: Prenada Group, 2015), p. 13.

Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah and Leonora Bakarbessy. Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan Hukum Jaminan. (Surabaya: Revka Petra Media, 2013).

Yuhelson. Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia, (Gorontalo: Ideas Publising).

Zulaeha, Mulyani. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Yang Memuat Klausula Arbitrase”, Jurnal Cita Hukum 2, no. 1 (2010).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v7i2.4228

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 125 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
View