Kewenangan ASEAN Political-Security Community dalam Menghadapi Klaim Nine-Dash Line China
Sari
This research analyzes the jurisdictional limitations of the ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) in addressing China's Nine-Dash Line claim in the South China Sea. Through a qualitative approach examining policy documents and recent academic literature, this study evaluates the effectiveness of instruments developed by APSC such as the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties (DOC) and the Code of Conduct (COC) negotiation process. The findings indicate that APSC's authority is constrained by several fundamental factors: the principles of non-intervention and consensus-based decision-making that create structural weaknesses, limitations in UNCLOS implementation due to China's rejection of the 2016 arbitration ruling, the dilemma of balancing "ASEAN centrality" with the need to involve external powers, and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms. Based on these findings, this research recommends: (1) development of a regional dispute resolution mechanism based on UNCLOS that can overcome jurisdictional limitations, (2) implementation of a "minilateralism" model involving directly affected ASEAN countries to address consensus barriers, and (3) strengthening APSC's institutional capacity through establishing dedicated monitoring bodies, rapid response protocols for maritime incidents, and integrating non-traditional security approaches as starting points for building trust among conflicting parties.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315796673/constructing-security-community-southeast-asia-amitav-acharya
Darmawan, A. Z. P. (2022). Konstelasi Geopolitik Tiongkok di Laut China Selatan: Studi Kasus Reklamasi dan Militerisasi Pulau Buatan oleh Tiongkok di Kepulauan Spratly. Hubungan Internasional Peradaban, 49–76.
Emmers, R. (2010). The Indochinese enlargement of ASEAN: security expectations and outcomes. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 59(1).
Firdaus, M. W. (2023). Pembangunan Wilayah Pesisir Dan Lautan Dalam Perspektif Negara Kepulauan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Platax, 1(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.35800/jip.1.2.2013.1251
Junef, M. (2016). Maritime Territorial Dispute in South China Sea. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 19(3).
Liliansa, D. (2019). The Necessity of Indonesia’s Measures to Sink Vessels for IUU Fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone. The Asian Journal of International Law, 10(1).
Mohadib, M. (2020). Prospek dan Tantangan Komunitas Politik Keamanan ASEAN. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 35(September 2018) https://jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/127/49
Nurhayati, E. (2020). Strategi Penegakan Hukum Laut Terhadap Illegal Fishing guna Mewujudkan Keamanan Maritim di Laut Natuna Utara [Indonesia Defense University]. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=kN7VjsoAAAAJ&citation_for_view=kN7VjsoAAAAJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC
Redjosari, S. M., Mauludina, R., & Sulistiara, W. R. (2023). Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Berkepanjangan Laut China Selatan menurut Perspektif United Nations Convention on The Law of The Sea (UNCLOS). Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indonesia, 5(2).
Tinh, L. D. (2018). ASEAN and Its Partners for Good Order at Sea : Problems and Proposals.
Utomo, H., Prihantoro, M., & Adriana, L. (2017). Peran Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Mengelola Konflik Laut China Selatan. Prodi Damai Dan Resolusi Konflik, 3 nomor 3.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jrs.v6i01.5984
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
 
Publishing Office :
Terindeks :
View Jurnal JURISTIC Stats


