ASPEK HUKUM KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DALAM MEDIA SOSIAL DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT ATAS BERITA BOHONG

Hadi Karyono, Dwinanda Linchia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas

Abstract


In the Indonesian constitutional system, one of the manifestations of democracy and popular sovereignty is the freedom of opinion and expression guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution, freedom of opinion and expression is a human right (Article 28). This right is regulated by international law and national law. However, the fact is that the implementation of freedom of opinion and expression in social media causes a lot and does not pay attention to human rights and the legal interests of others. In this research, the research approach used is normative juridical using secender data as the main data (primary legal materials, secender legal materials, tertiary legal materials) supported by primary data (observations and interviews), the research data is analyzed descriptively qualitative. The results showed (1) Freedom of opinion and expression in social media in Indonesia in the form of digital platforms such as social media has many misunderstandings in its implementation (2) The implementation of freedom of opinion in social media in Indonesia must be limited by the responsibility to maintain ethics, not harm others, and conflict with applicable laws in Indonesia.

References


Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar, ‘Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer’, Gema Keadilan, 7.1 (2020), pp. 20–33, doi:10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Karyono, Hadi, and Krismiyarsi Krismiyarsi, ‘Mencari Pemimpin Negarawan Membagun Demokrasi Berkeadaban Dan Dinamika Pemilihan Umum Presiden 2024 Menuju Indonesia Emas’, KERTHA WICAKSANA, 17.1 (2023), pp. 42–49

Musa, Muhammad Rafhael Purnawan, and others, ‘Human Rights and Pancasila: A Case of Tionghoa Ethnic Discrimination in Indonesia’, Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism, 1.1 (2022), pp. 119–70, doi:10.15294/ijpgc.v1i1.56879

Nasution, Latipah, ‘Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital’, ADALAH, 4.3 (2020), pp. 37–48, doi:10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200

Nations, United, ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, United Nations (United Nations) [accessed 24 June 2025]

Raskasih, Fadilah, ‘BATASAN KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT MELALUI MEDIA ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM DIKAITKAN DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT UU ITE’, JOURNAL EQUITABLE, 5.2 (2020), pp. 147–67, doi:10.37859/jeq.v5i2.2462

Stella, Helen, Gunardi Lie, and Moody Rizqy Syailendra, ‘Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Berita Bohong Berdasarkan Uu Ite Terhadap Dampak Dari Kebebasan Berpendapat Masyarakat Di Media Sosial (Kriminalisasi Kasus Jerinx)’, Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies, 3.4 (2023), pp. 472–78

Tanaya, Flavia, and others, ‘Aspek Kebebasan Berpendapat Menurut Hukum Positif untuk Meminimalisir Penyebaran Berita Bohong (Hoax) Menjelang Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia’, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4.2 (2023), pp. 358–66, doi:10.22225/juinhum.4.2.7821.358-366

Wibowo, Andre Tri, ‘Indonesian “Saracen†Syndicate and the Legal Gap for Hoax Eradication in Indonesia’, Law Research Review Quarterly, 7.2 (2021), pp. 183–96, doi:10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43190




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/malrev.v6i02.6307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Publishing Office :


Indexed in :





Creative Commons License