KAJIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYELIDIKAN ANTARA KEPOLISIAN, KPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN PIDANA KORUPSI DARI KELEMBAGAAN NEGARA

Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat

Abstract


There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.

Keywords : Authority, investigation, KPK

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi, Hamzah, Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi Konstitusi dan Konstitu sionalisme Indonesia, ed. Revisi. Jakarta:Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Bagirmanan, Kewenangan Hukum Penyelengga ra Negara, Bandung: Eresco, 1995.

Chaidir,Ellydar, Sistem Pemerintahan Nega ra Republik Indonesia Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Yogyakar ta : Total Media, 2008.

Diana Napitupulu, KPK in action, Jakarta: penerbit RAS, 2010

Evi Hartanti“Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Hotma.P.Sibuea, Azas Negara Hukum, Peratur an Kebijakan & Azas- Azas Umum Peme rintahan yang Baik. Penerbit: Erlangga, 2010,

Handoyo Setiono, Tesis Sejarah Hukum Kepoli sian Negara RI, 25 April 2010

Indriyanto Seno Adji, Korupsi dan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, 2006.

Joeniarto. Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2001.

Moh, Mahfud MD, Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Bogor, 31 Juli 2010.

Titik Triwulan Tutik, Konstruksi HukumTata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen 1945. Kencana, 2010.

Situs internet

Damang, Teori Kewenangan. http://psycholegal.blogspot.com. (diakses tanggal 13 Maret 2019)

Artikel Tesis, Disertasi dan Data Sumber yang tidak Diterbitkan

Konflik Kewenangan KPK dan POLRI, 8 Oktober 2012

Handoyo setiono, Tesis Sejarah Hukum Kepolisian Negara RI, 25 April 2010

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang- Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002, tentang KPK




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35973/sh.v17i1.1477

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 297 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.







Copyright of Jurnal Spektrum hukum

View My Stats