The Principles of Model Law Regarding the Implementation of Estate Execution in Transnational Bankruptcy Cases

Fafta Aini Putriana; Fahmi Fairuzzaman; Akbar Hidayat

doi:10.56444/jidh.v0i0.4465

The Principles of Model Law Regarding the Implementation of Estate Execution in Transnational Bankruptcy Cases

Fafta Aini Putriana, Fahmi Fairuzzaman, Akbar Hidayat

Sari

This research is important to find out what system should be used to create legal certainty regarding the execution of transnational bankruptcy cases. The purposes to be achieved are, first, to know the system that works within the principles of the Model Law developed by the United Nations in handling transnational bankruptcy execution cases. Second, knowing how national law creates execution rules if the foreign debtor's bankruptcy assets are in Indonesia's jurisdictionUsing juridical-normative research methods, the author attempts to analyze transnational bankruptcy based on international and national regulations. International rules are regulated in UNCITRAL: Model Law created by the UN and is a legal reference for countries that have transnational bankruptcy legal instruments with reference to this Model Law. Meanwhile, the national regulations are in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, which became known as UUK-PKPU. Model Law regulations provide legal certainty regarding transnational bankruptcy. different from national legal rules which are limited by jurisdiction. The substance of the Model Law provides an opportunity for foreign parties to participate in solving problems. The conclusion of this research is that the adoption of the Model Law by several countries will provide greater convenience and legal certainty in the field of bankruptcy law, especially transnational bankruptcy.

Kata Kunci

Boedel; Transnational Bankruptcy; UNCITRAL: Model Law.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi

Adolf, Huala. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Dalam Masalah Hukum Kepailitan: Tinjauan Hukum Internasional Dan Penerapannya.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 28 (2009): 24.

Amalia, Jihan. “Urgensi Implementasi Uncitral Model Law On Cross-Border Insolvency Di Indonesia: Studi Komparasi Hukum Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia Dan Singapura.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 2 (2019).

Andi, Ignatius. “Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Perkembangannya: Aspek Komparasi Dari Kepailitan (Cross-Border Bankruptcy) Dan Studi Kasus.” Prosiding, Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, 2004, 315.

Asnil, Dicky Moallavi. “UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency Sebagai Model Pengaturan Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia Dalam Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2018).

Detikfinance. “Sri Mulyani Beberkan Penyebab Banyak Perusahaan Bangkrut Saat Krisis,” 2020.

Enggarani, Nuria Siswi. “Independensi Peradilan Dan Negara Hukum.” Journal Law and Justice 3, no. 2 (2018): 83.

Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Hardjaloka, Laura. “Kepailitan Lintas Batas: Perspektif Hukum Internasional Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Instrumen Nasional Di Beberapa Negara.” Yuridika 30, no. 3 (2015): 480–504. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v30i3.1952.

Hikmah, Mutiara. Aspek – Aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional Dalam Perkara – Perkara Kepailitan. Jakarta: PT. Refika Aditama, 2007.

———. Hukum Perdata Internasional Dalam Perkara-Perkara Kepailitan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2007.

Ho, Look Chan. “Smoothing Cross-Border Insolvency by Synchronising the UNCITRAL Model Law: In Re Samsun Logix Corporation.” Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 2009, 135.

Hoff, Jeery. Undang-Undang Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa, 2000.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Straftrecht) (n.d.).

Kml. “Suba Dipailitkan Akibat Kesepakatan Diam-Diam.” Hukum Online, 2007.

Maryono, Antonius Sidik, Ulil Afwa dan Sindy Riani Putri Nurhasanah. “Quo Vadis Esensi Lembaga PKPU Pasca-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021.” Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 4 (2022).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, 2016.

Nations, United. “Model Law in Cross – Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment.” United Nations Publishing, 1997, 3.

Ni’ami, Mutimatun. “The Urgency Of Authentication And Protection Of Personal Data In Online Transactions.” Law and Justice 7, no. 2 (2022): 198.

Nurhayati, Siti. “Metodologi Penelitian Praktis Edisi Dua.” Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pekalongan, 2012, 8.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. “Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata Internasional.” N.V. Van Drop & Co 2, no. 1 (2010): 40.

Putri, Bintang Adita. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Hak Kreditor Dalam Melaksanakan Eksekusi Selaku Pemegang Jaminan Dengan Hak Tanggungan.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2014, 6.

Seng, Lee Kiat. “Cross-Border Insolvency Issues.” Law Gazette, 2009.

Simanjuntak, Ricardo. “Aspek-Aspek Transnasional Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia Dihubungkan Dengan Kewenangan Kurator Untuk Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Perekonomian Indonesia.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, 2012.

Sjahdeni, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang – Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Soogeun, Oh. “Comparative Overview of Asian Insolvency Reforms in the Last Decade,” 2007, 5.

Subhan, Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2009.

Suryana, Daniel. Kepailitan Terhadap Badan Usaha Asing Oleh Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Sutra, 2007.

Tarmidi, Lepi T. “Krisis Moneter Indonesia: Sebab, Dampak, Peran IMF Dan Saran.” In Krisis Moneter Tahun 1997/1998 Dan Peran IMF. Universitas Indonesia, 1998.

Tedjasukman. “Aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional Dalam Perkara-Perkara Kepailitan Dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Praktek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.4 Tahun 1998 Jo. Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perpu) No. 1 Tahun 1998,” n.d.

Tektona, Rahmadi Indra, and Dwi Ruli Handoko. “Implikasi Hukum Pailitnya Perseroan Perorangan Terhadap Direksi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 10.

Tomasic. “Insolvency Law in East Asia” 34, no. 2 (2012): 536.

UNCITRAL. “Status 1997 - Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency.” UNCITRAL, 2011.

Warren, J Keegan. “Global Marketing Management.” United State: Prentice Hall, 2002, 11.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v0i0.4465