Legal Politics of Electronic Documents in State Finances As Legal Evidence

Rizky Dian Bareta, Triyono Triyono, Rahmat Rahmat

Sari


Disruption of digital technology as part of the industrial revolution 4.0 forces changes in human culture to keep up with the times, including in public institutions. Regulating the digitalization of state finances has risks, including electronic evidence in court that is very likely to occur, given that corruption in state finances is still rampant, requiring legal evidence in court. This research is normative research by examining the existence of regulations related to electronic documents in state finances and explaining how electronic documents are formed. In this study, it can be concluded that regulations regarding electronic evidence have been adequately accommodated, although there is still an asymmetry in the classification of electronic evidence itself. Regulations governing electronic documents in the field of state finances still refer to laws regarding electronic information and transactions. These regulations are considered complete, although, in several regulations in the field of state finance, adjustments are still required to support the use of electronic documents in state finances. Electronic signatures are divided into certified and uncertified signatures, but certified signatures make the presence of an ideal electronic document. This research can be used as input for policymakers in implementing electronic documents in state finance.


Kata Kunci


electronic documents; state finances; electronic signature; electronic evidence; corruption

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi


Ashad. Teori Modernitas Dan Globalisasi. Sidoarjo: Kreasi Wacana, 2014.

Center for Legal and Judicial Research and Development of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Kedudukan Dan Relevansi Yurisprudensi Untuk Mengurangi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI, 2010.

“Digital Signature Standard.” In Safeguarding Critical E-Documents, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204909.app1.

Fuadi, Munir. Teori-Teori Besar Dalam Hukum (Grand Theory). Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

Hernandez-Ardieta, J. L. Enhancing The Reliability of Digital Signature as Non-Repudiation Evidence Under a Holistic Treat Model. Leganes: University Carlos III of Madrid, 2011.

Heryadi, Adi, Ilham B Tarigan, and Weni Astuti. “Memahami Indeks Persepsi Korupsi (IPK) Indonesia Dan Kontribusi Polisi Militer Untuk Meningkatkan IPK.” DHARMA BAKTI, 2022. https://doi.org/10.34151/dharma.v5i1.3928.

Imron, Dkk. Hukum Pembuktian. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2017.

Isma, Nur Laili; Koyimatun, Arima. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Pada Dokumen Elektronik Serta Hasil Cetaknya Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 2014.

John Naisbitt. “Global Paradox: The Bigger the World Economy, the More Powerful Its Smallest Players.” Choice Reviews Online, 1994. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-5537.

Komalasari, Rita. “Manfaat Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19.” TEMATIK, 2020. https://doi.org/10.38204/tematik.v7i1.369.

Maiyuni, Chella. “KUHP.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2013.

Martiman Prodjohamidjojo. Komentar Atas KUHAP: Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 1984.

Mulyadi, Sri Fitria, Dadan Kurniansyah, and Made Panji Teguh Santoso. “Implementasi Penerapan Aplikasi Sambara Dalam Administrasi Wajib Pajak Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kabupaten Karawang.” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa, 2021. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipsk.v6i2.1887.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.” In 2, 2016.

Nasution, S. “Metode Penelitian.” Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. “Digital Signature Standard (DSS).” Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, 2009.

Nurhardianto, Fajar. “Sistem Hukum Dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Tapis, 2015.

Raharjo, A. Pemahaman Dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Romli Atmasasmita. Hukum Kejahatan Bisnis Teori Dan Praktik Di Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

Sahya Anggara. Administrasi Keuangan Negara. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2016.

Soekamto, S, and S Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suara Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Stallings W. & Brown. L. Computer Security, Principles And Practice, 3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2015.

Suhendar, Suhendar. “Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Optik Hukum Pidana.” Pamulang Law Review, 2019. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v1i1.2849.

Suhendar, Suhendar, and Kartono Kartono. “Kerugian Keuangan Negara Telaah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2020. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v11i2.8048.

Suherman. “Pola Mutasi, Reward & Punishment vs Fraud.” Djkn, 2017.

Wahyudi, Johan. “Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian Di PengadilaN.” Perspektif, 2012. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i2.101.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v7i2.3362

Article Metrics

Sari view : 233 times
PDF (English) - 0 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.






Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum indexed at:



Member of:



Visitors:

Tandai Penghitung

Web
Analytics