The Juridical Analysis of the Urgency of Ratifying the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia

Christian Samuel Lodoe Haga; Netanya Aurora Siwy

doi:10.56444/jidh.v0i0.4016

The Juridical Analysis of the Urgency of Ratifying the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia

Christian Samuel Lodoe Haga, Netanya Aurora Siwy

Sari

This research has the purpose of providing a juridical analysis of the urgency of ratifying the asset confiscation law in Indonesia. This article emphasizes normative juridical research with a case study approach, statutory approach, as well as empirical approach to understand the asset confiscation draft law as norms that apply to society. The type of data analyzed in this article are mainly secondary data from the Indonesian law, books, news, previous research, and journals related to money crime and asset confiscation draft law. Previous research found that Indonesia’s corruption Perception Index reached its lowest point of 34 out of 100 last year, indicating that corruption and money crime continue to occur even after a multitude of efforts to combat corrupt practices. Hence, the Indonesian law system requires an extraordinary effort to cope with this extraordinary crime, specifically through the asset confiscation law. Several indicators discovered from this research reveal the urgency of this law. The asset confiscation law would be a solution to the problems of economic crimes in Indonesia through its function as a social control to achieve legal objectives, namely justice.

Kata Kunci

Corruption, Money Crime, Asset Confiscation Law, Urgency.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi

Adiwijana, Muhammad Reza. “Pembebanan Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Media Iuris 3, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v3i1.18416.

Arifin, Ridwan, Indah Sri Utari, and Herry Subondo. “Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) 1, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v1i1.10810.

Candra Yuri Nuralam. “Jokowi Sepakat RUU Perampasan Aset Segera Dituntaskan.” Media Indonesia, n.d. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/562469/jokowi-sepakat-ruu-perampasan-aset-segera-dituntaskan.

CNN Indonesia. “Jokowi Harap RUU Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Rampung 2022.” CNN Indonesia, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNPB5cNe5QQ.

Crawford, Lizabeth A., and Katherine B. Novak. “Deviance and Social Control.” In Individual and Society, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269313-9.

Dewi Nurita. “Bareskrim Sebut 15 Pucuk Senjata Dito Mahendra Tidak Ada Kaitanya Dengan Kasus TPPU Nurhadi.” Tempo.com, 2023. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1711183/bareskrim-sebut-15-pucuk-senjata-dito-mahendra-tidak-ada-kaitannya-dengan-kasus-tppu-nurhadi.

Fauzia, Ana, and Fathul Hamdani. “Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.249.

Gochhayat, Sai Abhipsa. “‘Social Engineering by Roscoe Pound’: Issues in Legal and Political Philosophy.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742165.

Haris, Budi Saiful. “Penguatan Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Integrasi 2, no. 1 (2016).

Jonaedi Efendi, S H I, S H Johnny Ibrahim, and M M Se. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris, 2018.

Karinda, Frans Jomar, Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, and Mohamad Ismed. “Upaya Pemulihan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Guna Mengoptimalisasi Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 9, no. 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27688.

KOMPAS TV. “Penjelasan Lengkap Mahfud MD Soal Transaksi Janggal Rp 349 Triliun Di Kemenkeu.” Indonesia, 2023.

Latifah, Marfuatul. “Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal NEGARA HUKUM 6, no. 1 (2015).

———. “Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia (the Urgency of Assets Recovery Act in Indonesia).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 6, no. 1 (2016).

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum, 2004.

Naim, Ngainun. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia,” in Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia 3, no. 3 (2007).

Nugraha, Sigit Prabawa. “Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” National Conference For Law Studies, 2020.

Nugroho, Nunung. “Kebijakan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Dalam Dinamika Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 3, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35973/jidh.v3i1.1355.

Pahlevi, Reza. “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia (2021).” Databoks, 2022.

Prof. Moeljatno, S.H. KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana), 2021.

Putra, Diky Anandya Kharystya, and Vidya Prahassacitta. “Tinjauan Atas Kriminalisasi Illicit Enrichment Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Dengan Australia.” Indonesia Criminal Law Review 1, no. 1 (2021).

RI, DPR. “Program Legislasi Nasional.” Program Legislasi Nasional, 2023. http://www.dpr.go.id/uu/prolegnas.

Rofiq Hidayat. “6 Alasan Mendesaknya RUU Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana.” Hukum Online, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/6-alasan-mendesaknya-ruu-perampasan-aset-tindak-pidana-lt603746add2caa/?page=1.

Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah. “Sistem Beban Pembuktian Dinamis: Paradigma Kebijakan Kriminal Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Majelis 02, no. Februari (2019).

Soekanto, Soerdjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, 2001.

Susanti. “Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press, 1986, Hal. 3.” UIB Repository, 2018.

Syahmin, Malkian Elvani, and Henny Yuningsih. Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tipikor Melalui Kerjasama Timbal Balik Antar Negara. Laporan Penelitian Fundamental, 2013.

Syamsuddin, Ahmad Rustan. “Pembuktian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5942.

Taniady, Vicko, and Novi Wahyu Riwayanti. “Reformulasi Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Berlandaskan Asas Presumption of Guilt Terhadap Kasus TPPU Di Indonesia.” Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v1i2.53702.

Tumiwa, Adrian Formen. “Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Lex Crimen 7, no. 2 (2018).

Vettori, Barbara. Tough on Criminal Wealth: Exploring the Practice of Proceeds from Crime Confiscation in the EU. Tough on Criminal Wealth: Exploring the Practice of Proceeds from Crime Confiscation in the EU, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4129-7.

Webb, Philippa. “The United Nations Convention against Corruption.” Journal of International Economic Law 8, no. 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jielaw/jgi009.

Wildan Noviansah. “ICW Sebut TPPU Di RI Ibarat Gunung Es, Ungkit Kasus Rafael Alun.” Detik.com, 2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6651650/icw-sebut-tppu-di-ri-ibarat-gunung-es-ungkit-kasus-rafael-alun.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v0i0.4016